Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Nightwish album
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Feel free to restore it once it passes WP:HAMMER. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:34, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- 2011 Nightwish album (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:CRYSTAL; a lot of self-published blogs and first-hand sources. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:10, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this one is obvious per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HAMMER. The fact that the album is in the works can be mentioned at the band's page. For the foreseeable future there is not nearly enough to go on for a stand-alone album article. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:32, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Doomsdayer. No title, no track listing and no release date. This is already included in its own section at the artist's article as it should be for now, and there's not really enough for a stand-alone article yet. Cliff smith talk 19:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL. Velociraptor888 19:43, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Enough verifiable information now to justify the page. Likely to be added to with further such information. Would be better not to delete a page that is 'on the up' like this. Like all Wiki pages, it is a 'work in progress'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.7.166.104 (talk) 20:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Incubation might be a good idea. Cliff smith talk 16:09, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.